cabbage: have leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have leaves 1.00
have leaves on leaves 0.99
have leaves on outside leaves 0.97
have dark leaves on leaves 0.96
have leaves on leaves on inside 0.96
have dark leaves on outside leaves 0.94
leaves help 0.94
have dark leaves on leaves on inside 0.93
have leaves on outside leaves on inside 0.92
have dark leaves 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cabbage, have leaves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(plant, have leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(plant, have leaves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(plant, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cabbage, have leaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cabbage, have leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, leaves help)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cabbage, leaves help)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cabbage, leaves help)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cabbage, leaves help)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, have leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cabbage, have leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, have leaves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(cabbage, have leaves)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, have leaves)