cable: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents internet service provider
Weight: 0.65
, satellite
Weight: 0.63
, utility
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, jumper cable
Weight: 0.34
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.34
, antenna
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(cable, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(cable, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality better)