cacti: have very few stomata

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.43
, tool
Weight: 0.36
, storage
Weight: 0.35
Siblings cactus
Weight: 0.32
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.31
, cycad
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have very few stomata 1.00
have few stomata 0.98
has physical part stomata 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cactus, have very few stomata)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cactus, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cactus, have very few stomata)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cacti, have very few stomata)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have very few stomata)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cacti, have very few stomata)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cacti, have very few stomata)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cactus, have very few stomata)