:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(yucca, droop)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(yucca, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(yucca, droop)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, droop)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cactus, droop)
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, droop)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cactus, droop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(yucca, droop)