cactus: has physical part spines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yucca
Weight: 0.54
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part spines 1.00
have sharp spines 0.93
have spines on leaves 0.92
have spines instead of leaves 0.91
grow spines instead of leaves 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cactus, has physical part spines)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cactus, have spines on leaves)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cactus, have spines on leaves)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(cactus, have sharp spines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, have spines on leaves)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cactus, have sharp spines)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, have sharp spines)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cactus, have spines on leaves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cactus, have sharp spines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cactus, has physical part spines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cactus, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cactus, has physical part spines)