cage: be bad for hamsters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, bird
Weight: 0.52
, device
Weight: 0.50
Siblings crate
Weight: 0.33
, barn owl
Weight: 0.32
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.32
, fence
Weight: 0.32
, doorknob
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for hamsters 1.00
be bad for animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cage, be bad for hamsters)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cage, be bad for animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cage, be bad for animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cage, be bad for animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cage, be bad for animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cage, be bad for hamsters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cage, be bad for hamsters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cage, be bad for hamsters)