cake: be at grocery store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.69
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, sauce
Weight: 0.59
, sweet
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.77
, pancake
Weight: 0.66
, mousse
Weight: 0.54
, cobbler
Weight: 0.48
, apple pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grocery store 1.00
be at store 0.90
be at restaurant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(apple pie, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cake, be at grocery store)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cake, be at store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cake, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cake, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at restaurant)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cake, be at store)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cake, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at grocery store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cake, be at grocery store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(apple pie, be at restaurant)