cake: be good for dessert

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents birthday party
Weight: 0.69
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, sauce
Weight: 0.59
, sweet
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.77
, pancake
Weight: 0.66
, mousse
Weight: 0.54
, cobbler
Weight: 0.48
, apple pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dessert 1.00
be used to dessert 0.96
be eat for dessert 0.96
be delicious 0.85
be eat after dinner 0.79
be nice to eat 0.78
be a part of pizza 0.78
be spicy or hot 0.78
be serve for breakfast 0.78
be at cake tin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(sauce, be a part of pizza)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be good for dessert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(sauce, be a part of pizza)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sauce, be a part of pizza)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be eat after dinner)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pancake, be serve for breakfast)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be delicious)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(dessert, be eat after dinner)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(sauce, be a part of pizza)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(sauce, be spicy or hot)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple pie, be delicious)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be delicious)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pancake, be serve for breakfast)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(pancake, be serve for breakfast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cake, be good for dessert)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cake, be eat for dessert)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cake, be used to dessert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cake, be used to dessert)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cake, be eat for dessert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cake, be used to dessert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cake, be eat for dessert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cake, be at cake tin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cake, be nice to eat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cake, be at cake tin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be nice to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cake, be nice to eat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cake, be at cake tin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cake, be used to dessert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cake, be eat for dessert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cake, be nice to eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cake, be at cake tin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(cake, be good for dessert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sauce, be a part of pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(apple pie, be delicious)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pancake, be serve for breakfast)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dessert, be eat after dinner)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, be spicy or hot)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(cake, be good for dessert)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sauce, be a part of pizza)