# calculus: be hard at little rock central

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents mathWeight: 0.61, topicWeight: 0.60, thingWeight: 0.59, courseWeight: 0.59, subjectWeight: 0.58 Siblings mathematicsWeight: 0.35, algebraWeight: 0.34, arithmeticWeight: 0.33, boolean algebraWeight: 0.33

## Related properties

 Similarity Property be hard at little rock central 1.00 be hard at rock central 0.97 be hard at little rock 0.95 be hard at rock 0.91 is hard 0.80 is considered hard 0.77 is 2 hard 0.76

## Clauses

### Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(math, is hard)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)

### Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(math, is hard)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

### Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(math, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

### Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(algebra, is 2 hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(algebra, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)

### Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(math, is hard)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)

### Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(algebra, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(algebra, is hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(algebra, is 2 hard)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(algebra, is 2 hard)

### Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(calculus, be hard at little rock central)

### Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(calculus, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is considered hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(calculus, is considered hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(calculus, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(calculus, is considered hard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(calculus, is considered hard)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(calculus, is hard)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(math, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

### Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mathematics, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(algebra, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(algebra, is 2 hard)

### Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(math, is hard)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(calculus, be hard at little rock central)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)