calculus: was used back then

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents math
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, course
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, algebra
Weight: 0.34
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used back then 1.00
was used back 0.97
was used then 0.95
be used in pokémon 0.81
be used 0.77
be used for for life 0.76
be used for for real life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(math, be used)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(calculus, was used back then)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(math, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(algebra, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(math, be used)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(calculus, was used back then)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(algebra, be used)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(algebra, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(calculus, was used back then)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in pokémon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in pokémon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used for for real life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in pokémon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(calculus, be used in pokémon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(calculus, be used for for real life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used for for real life)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(calculus, be used for for real life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(calculus, was used back then)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(math, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(algebra, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(calculus, was used back then)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(math, be used)