calendar: be at your desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, web site
Weight: 0.59
, page
Weight: 0.58
Siblings calender
Weight: 0.33
, web browser
Weight: 0.33
, web
Weight: 0.33
, preview
Weight: 0.32
, list
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at your desk 1.00
be at desk 0.96
be at appointment in desk drawer 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calender, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calender, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(calender, be at desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(list, be at appointment in desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(calendar, be at your desk)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at desk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(calendar, be at desk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(calendar, be at desk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(calendar, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(calendar, be at your desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(calender, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(calendar, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(list, be at appointment in desk drawer)