california: be on fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on fire 1.00
be on fire 2018 1.00
be on fire time 0.97
have fires 0.85
get fires 0.85
has fires 0.84
get many fires 0.84
have many fires 0.84
have fires year 0.84
have forest fires 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(colorado, be on fire)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be on fire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(colorado, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(colorado, be on fire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(los angeles, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be on fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(california, be on fire)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(california, have fires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(california, have fires)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(california, have fires)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(california, have fires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(california, be on fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(california, be on fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(colorado, be on fire)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(california, be on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(los angeles, be on fire)