california: be warmer than chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be warmer than chicago 1.00
be warmer than washington dc 0.86
be warmer than coast 0.80
have more erathquakes than florida 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(california, be warmer than chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(california, be warmer than washington dc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(california, be warmer than washington dc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(california, be warmer than washington dc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(california, be warmer than washington dc)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(california, have more erathquakes than florida)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(california, have more erathquakes than florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(california, have more erathquakes than florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(california, have more erathquakes than florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(california, be warmer than chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(california, be warmer than chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(california, be warmer than chicago)