california: has desert

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has desert 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(california, has desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new mexico, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(california, has desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(nevada, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nevada, has desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(california, has desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, has desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(california, has desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new mexico, has desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nevada, has desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(california, has desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new mexico, has desert)