california: have 55 electrol votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have votes 1.00
have 55 votes 1.00
have 55 electrol votes 1.00
have 54 votes 1.00
be elecoral votes 0.99
be votes 0.99
have electoral votes 0.91
have 55 electoral votes 0.91
have 54 electoral votes 0.91
has fifty-five electoral votes 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(california, have votes)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(california, have 55 votes)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(california, have 55 votes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(california, have votes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(california, have 55 votes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(california, have votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(california, have electoral votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(california, have 54 electoral votes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(california, have 55 electoral votes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(california, have 54 electoral votes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(california, have 55 electoral votes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(california, have 54 electoral votes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(california, have 55 electoral votes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(california, have electoral votes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(california, have electoral votes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(california, have 55 votes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(california, have 54 electoral votes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(california, have 55 electoral votes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(california, have votes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(california, have electoral votes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(california, have 55 electrol votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(california, have 55 electrol votes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(california, have 55 electrol votes)