california: have drought

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have drought 1.00
be in drought 1.00
get drought 0.99
has state drought 0.98
be in big drought 0.97
have drought problem 0.96
experience drought 0.94
be in severe drought 0.94
suffer from drought 0.93
have droughts 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be in drought)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(los angeles, be in drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be in drought)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(california, have drought)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(california, be in drought)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(california, be in drought)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(california, be in drought)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(california, be in drought)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(california, have drought)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(california, have drought)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(california, have drought) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(los angeles, be in drought)