call: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
Siblings reaction
Weight: 0.56
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.34
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.33
, press
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at desk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(call, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be at desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell phone, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(call, be at office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(call, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(call, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(call, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be at desk)