call: be used to communication

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
Siblings reaction
Weight: 0.56
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.34
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.33
, press
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to communication 1.00
be used to communicate 0.81
be used to communicate idea 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(call, be used to communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(call, be used to communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(statement, be used to communicate)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(statement, be used to communicate idea)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be used to communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(call, be used to communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(statement, be used to communicate idea)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(call, be used to communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mobile phone, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be used to communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(call, be used to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(call, be used to communicate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(call, be used to communicate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(call, be used to communicate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communicate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(call, be used to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate idea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be used to communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(call, be used to communication)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(statement, be used to communicate idea)