call: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.60
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
, calling
Weight: 0.49
, offside
Weight: 0.46
, reveille
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
is 4 cheaper 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(call, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(part, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(call, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(part, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(part, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(calling, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(calling, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cell phone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(call, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(part, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(call, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(calling, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(calling, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(calling, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(calling, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(call, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(call, is 4 cheaper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(call, is 4 cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(call, is 4 cheaper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(call, is 4 cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(call, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(part, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(calling, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calling, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(part, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(call, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cell phone, is expensive)