call: were made on phone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents statement
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, cell phone
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.56
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.60
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
, calling
Weight: 0.49
, offside
Weight: 0.46
, reveille
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were made on phone 1.00
were made on first phone 0.97
was made 0.80
be made 0.79
go directly to voicemail 0.76
going to voicemail 0.76
be answered with bluetooth headset 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, was made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(call, were made on phone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, be made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(call, were made on phone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell phone, was made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, was made)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, was made)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(call, were made on phone)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(cell phone, be made)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(call, were made on phone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(call, were made on phone)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on first phone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(call, be made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(call, was made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(call, be made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(call, was made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(call, be made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(call, be answered with bluetooth headset)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(call, go directly to voicemail)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(call, go directly to voicemail)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(call, going to voicemail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(call, go directly to voicemail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(call, was made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(call, be answered with bluetooth headset)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, go directly to voicemail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(call, going to voicemail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(call, be made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(call, going to voicemail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(call, be answered with bluetooth headset)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(call, were made on first phone)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(call, was made)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(call, were made on first phone)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(call, be answered with bluetooth headset)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(call, were made on first phone)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(call, going to voicemail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on phone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(call, were made on phone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell phone, was made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cell phone, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cell phone, was made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(call, were made on phone)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cell phone, be made)