calligraphy: mean beautihul writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents art
Weight: 0.73
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, form
Weight: 0.53
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, painting
Weight: 0.36
, poetry
Weight: 0.36
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
mean beautihul writing 1.00
mean writing 1.00
mean 0.80
be read 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(form, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(form, mean)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(activity, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(activity, mean)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(form, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poetry, mean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(activity, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(form, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poetry, mean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poetry, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, mean writing)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(calligraphy, mean writing)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean writing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, be read)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(calligraphy, be read)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(calligraphy, be read)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, be read)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, mean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(calligraphy, mean)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(form, mean)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(poetry, mean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(form, mean)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(calligraphy, mean beautihul writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(activity, mean)