calligraphy: was regarded form of arts in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents art
Weight: 0.73
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, form
Weight: 0.53
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, painting
Weight: 0.36
, poetry
Weight: 0.36
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was regarded form of arts in china 1.00
was regarded form of visual arts in china 0.96
was regarded highest form of arts in china 0.96
was regarded form of arts 0.95
was regarded highest form of visual arts in china 0.93
was regarded form in china 0.93
was regarded form of visual arts 0.90
was regarded highest form of arts 0.89
was considered art form in heian 0.87
was regarded highest form in china 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of visual arts in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of visual arts in china)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was considered art form in heian)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of visual arts in china)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of visual arts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form in china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of visual arts in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts in china)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(calligraphy, was regarded highest form of arts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was regarded form of arts in china)