calling: be derogatory frog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.52
, telephone
Weight: 0.51
, call
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.49
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, dial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be derogatory frog 1.00
is jew derogatory 0.89
be ape racist 0.80
is gorilla racist 0.79
is racist 0.79
is dog insulting 0.77
is black racist 0.77
be disrespectful crab 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(calling, is jew derogatory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(calling, be ape racist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(calling, is dog insulting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(calling, be disrespectful crab)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calling, is gorilla racist)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(calling, is racist)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(calling, is black racist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(calling, is gorilla racist)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calling, is jew derogatory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(calling, be ape racist)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(calling, be ape racist)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(calling, is dog insulting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(calling, is gorilla racist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(calling, is gorilla racist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(calling, be disrespectful crab)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(calling, be ape racist)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(calling, be disrespectful crab)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(calling, be disrespectful crab)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(calling, is dog insulting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(calling, is dog insulting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(calling, is jew derogatory)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calling, is racist)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(calling, is black racist)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(calling, is racist)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(calling, is jew derogatory)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calling, is black racist)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(calling, is racist)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(calling, is black racist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(calling, be derogatory frog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(calling, be derogatory frog)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(calling, be derogatory frog)