calorie: be calculated in nutrition facts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, value
Weight: 0.55
, information
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.33
, snack
Weight: 0.33
, muffin
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated in nutrition facts 1.00
be exactly measured for nutrition facts 0.93
be physically counted for nutrition info 0.80
be calculated 0.78
be calculated doing 0.76
be important in diet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(time, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(value, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(value, be calculated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(time, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(value, be calculated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(time, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(time, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(value, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(calorie, be calculated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be important in diet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(calorie, be calculated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(calorie, be calculated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(calorie, be important in diet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(calorie, be important in diet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(calorie, be important in diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(value, be calculated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(time, be calculated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(value, be calculated)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(calorie, be calculated in nutrition facts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(time, be calculated)