calorie: be from solid fats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, value
Weight: 0.55
, information
Weight: 0.55
Siblings soda
Weight: 0.33
, snack
Weight: 0.33
, muffin
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from solid fats 1.00
be from fat important 0.80
be different from calories from fat 0.80
be from fat bad 0.80
be important in healthy diet 0.78
be in fat 0.78
is healthy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(muffin, is healthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(soda, is healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(soda, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soda, is healthy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(muffin, is healthy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(muffin, is healthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(calorie, be from fat bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(calorie, be from fat bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from fat bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(calorie, be in fat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(calorie, be from fat bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be in fat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(calorie, be in fat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(calorie, be in fat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be different from calories from fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from fat important)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(calorie, is healthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be important in healthy diet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(calorie, be different from calories from fat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(calorie, be different from calories from fat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(calorie, be from fat important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(calorie, be different from calories from fat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(calorie, be from fat important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(calorie, is healthy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calorie, be from fat important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(calorie, is healthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(calorie, is healthy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calorie, be important in healthy diet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(calorie, be important in healthy diet)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(calorie, be important in healthy diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(calorie, be from solid fats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(muffin, is healthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(calorie, be from solid fats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soda, is healthy)