camel: has physical part teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part teeth 1.00
has physical part hair 0.86
has physical part fangs 0.86
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part ears 0.85
has physical part gums 0.84
has physical part tongue 0.84
has physical part mouth 0.83
has physical part toes 0.83
has physical part lips 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(donkey, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(elephant, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(elephant, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(camel, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(camel, has physical part ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(camel, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(donkey, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(elephant, has physical part ears)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(camel, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)