camera: be helpful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful 1.00
be useful 0.90
is useful 0.89
be useful in business 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camera, be helpful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(camera, be helpful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(camera, be helpful)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(camera, be useful in business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(camera, be useful in business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful in business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(camera, be useful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camera, be useful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(camera, be useful in business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(camera, be useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, be helpful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camera, be helpful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(camera, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)