camera: be in space

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in space 1.00
work in space 0.95
take up space 0.88
need space management system 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(driver, need space management system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(camera, be in space)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(driver, need space management system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driver, need space management system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(driver, need space management system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(camera, be in space)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(camera, be in space)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(camera, work in space)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camera, work in space)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(camera, work in space)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(camera, work in space)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in space)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(camera, be in space)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(driver, need space management system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(camera, be in space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(driver, need space management system)