camera: be useful in astronomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in astronomy 1.00
be useful 0.77
is useful 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(camera, be useful in astronomy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(camera, be useful in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(camera, be useful in astronomy)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(camera, be useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(camera, be useful)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(camera, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful in astronomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(camera, be useful in astronomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(camera, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)