camera: capture image

Related concepts

Parents	digital camera Weight: 0.75 , electronic device Weight: 0.68 , recorder Weight: 0.64 , driver Weight: 0.61
Siblings	camera lens Weight: 0.70 , human eye Weight: 0.60 , underwater Weight: 0.54 , cctv Weight: 0.54 , flip Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
capture image	1.00
capture images	0.92
capture picture	0.90
capture pictures	0.89
capture color	0.88
have image quality	0.87
capture rectangular images	0.85
actually capture vision	0.85
do produce image quality	0.85
do produce same image quality	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(digital camera, capture images) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(camera, capture image)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(digital camera, do produce image quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(camera, capture image)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, do produce same image quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(camera, capture image)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(digital camera, do produce image quality)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(digital camera, do produce same image quality)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(digital camera, capture images)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, do produce same image quality)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, do produce image quality)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(digital camera, capture images)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(cctv, have image quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(digital camera, capture images) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(camera, capture image)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.04

Plausible(digital camera, do produce image quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(camera, capture image)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(digital camera, do produce same image quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(camera, capture image)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(cctv, have image quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(cctv, have image quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(camera, capture image)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(camera, capture image)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(digital camera, do produce image quality)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(digital camera, do produce same image quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(cctv, have image quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(digital camera, capture images)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(digital camera, do produce image quality)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.07

Typical(camera, capture image) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(digital camera, do produce same image quality)