camera: has lens

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human eye
Weight: 0.60
, microphone
Weight: 0.36
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.36
, cellphone
Weight: 0.35
, projector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has lens 1.00
has lens and retina 0.87
has lense 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(human eye, has lens and retina)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(human eye, has lens and retina)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(human eye, has lens and retina)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(camera, has lens)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(camera, has lense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(camera, has lense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(camera, has lense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(camera, has lense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camera, has lens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(camera, has lens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(camera, has lens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(human eye, has lens and retina)