camouflage: affect predation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, print
Weight: 0.55
, pattern
Weight: 0.53
, design
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tan
Weight: 0.32
, hair color
Weight: 0.32
, mask
Weight: 0.32
, blue line
Weight: 0.32
, armor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect predation 1.00
protect animals within particular habitat 0.76
protect animals within habitat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(camouflage, affect predation)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(camouflage, protect animals within particular habitat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(camouflage, protect animals within habitat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, protect animals within habitat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, protect animals within particular habitat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(camouflage, protect animals within particular habitat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(camouflage, protect animals within habitat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(camouflage, protect animals within particular habitat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(camouflage, protect animals within habitat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(camouflage, affect predation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camouflage, affect predation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camouflage, affect predation)