camping: is big deal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adventure
Weight: 0.65
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, hobby
Weight: 0.61
, experience
Weight: 0.58
, water sport
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hiking
Weight: 0.57
, rafting
Weight: 0.35
, canoeing
Weight: 0.34
, boating
Weight: 0.34
, fishing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big deal 1.00
is deal 0.92
is big 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(experience, is big)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camping, is big deal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(experience, is big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(experience, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(experience, is big)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(camping, is big deal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(camping, is big deal)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(camping, is deal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camping, is deal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(camping, is deal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(camping, is deal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camping, is big deal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camping, is big deal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(experience, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camping, is big deal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(experience, is big)