campus: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents site
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, building
Weight: 0.57
Siblings university
Weight: 0.67
, fraternity
Weight: 0.59
, greek
Weight: 0.56
, ub
Weight: 0.38
, public library
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fraternity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(campus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fraternity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fraternity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(campus, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(campus, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(campus, has quality right)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(campus, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(campus, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(campus, has quality right)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(campus, has quality right)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality right)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(campus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fraternity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(campus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)