can good: be at cellar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cellar 1.00
be at cupboard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(can good, be at cellar)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(can good, be at cupboard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(can good, be at cupboard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(can good, be at cupboard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(can good, be at cupboard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(can good, be at cellar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(can good, be at cellar)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(can good, be at cellar)