canada: be considered country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered country 1.00
be considered as country 0.98
be considered country with quality 0.92
be considered as great country 0.90
be country 0.90
be called country 0.89
is country 0.89
be considered country with quality of life 0.89
be known as country 0.87
be like country 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(canada, be considered country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(australia, be considered country)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new zealand, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(canada, be considered country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(australia, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(australia, be considered country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(australia, is country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(canada, be considered country)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, is country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(canada, is country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(canada, is country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(canada, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(canada, be considered country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(australia, is country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(australia, be considered country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(canada, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new zealand, is country)