canada: be great

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, european union
Weight: 0.65
, mexico
Weight: 0.63
Siblings south korea
Weight: 0.66
, alaska
Weight: 0.65
, quebec
Weight: 0.64
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be great 1.00
make great beer 0.81
be know as great white north 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mexico, make great beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mexico, make great beer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mexico, make great beer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mexico, make great beer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(canada, be great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(canada, be great)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(canada, be know as great white north)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(canada, be know as great white north)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(canada, be know as great white north)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(canada, be know as great white north)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(canada, be great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canada, be great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mexico, make great beer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(canada, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mexico, make great beer)