canada: have population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, new zealand
Weight: 0.67
, latin america
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.65
Siblings alaska
Weight: 0.65
, vancouver
Weight: 0.57
, australia
Weight: 0.38
, usa
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have population 1.00
have population density 0.89
have low population density 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, have population)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(australia, have population)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(vancouver, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vancouver, have population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(canada, have population)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population density)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(canada, have low population density)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(canada, have population density)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(canada, have low population density)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(canada, have population density)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(canada, have population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(vancouver, have population)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(canada, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(australia, have population)