canadian: were treated during world war 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents american
Weight: 0.64
, currency
Weight: 0.54
, north america
Weight: 0.49
, european
Weight: 0.48
, field
Weight: 0.47
Siblings african american
Weight: 0.37
, george washington
Weight: 0.36
, native american
Weight: 0.36
, south america
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated during world war 2 1.00
were treated in 1920s 0.85
were interned during world war 2 0.81
were considered storm troops in world war 1 0.81
were treated by japanese 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1920s)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(african american, were treated in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(african american, were treated in 1920s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(canadian, were treated in 1920s)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(canadian, were treated in 1920s)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(canadian, were treated in 1920s)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(canadian, were interned during world war 2)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(canadian, were considered storm troops in world war 1)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(canadian, were considered storm troops in world war 1)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(canadian, were treated by japanese)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(canadian, were interned during world war 2)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(canadian, were treated by japanese)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(canadian, were treated by japanese)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(canadian, were considered storm troops in world war 1)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(canadian, were interned during world war 2)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were treated in 1920s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were considered storm troops in world war 1)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were treated by japanese)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were interned during world war 2)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(canadian, were treated during world war 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(canadian, were treated during world war 2) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(african american, were treated in 1920s)