canal: be in amsterdam

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, technology
Weight: 0.52
, part
Weight: 0.51
, feature
Weight: 0.51
Siblings root canal
Weight: 0.35
, reservoir
Weight: 0.33
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in amsterdam 1.00
be in venice 0.77
be in venice blue 0.76
be in venice green 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(canal, be in amsterdam)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(canal, be in venice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(canal, be in venice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(canal, be in venice green)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(canal, be in venice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(canal, be in venice green)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(canal, be in venice green)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(canal, be in venice blue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(canal, be in venice)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(canal, be in venice blue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canal, be in venice green)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(canal, be in venice blue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(canal, be in venice blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(canal, be in amsterdam)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canal, be in amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canal, be in amsterdam)