canberra: be designed way

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, new south wales
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.50
, capital
Weight: 0.46
Siblings brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, sydney
Weight: 0.32
, tasmania
Weight: 0.32
, auckland
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed way 1.00
was used built 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(canberra, be designed way)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(canberra, was used built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(canberra, was used built)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(canberra, was used built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(canberra, was used built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(canberra, be designed way)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(canberra, be designed way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(canberra, be designed way)