candidate: be at disadvantage

Related concepts

Parents	political party Weight: 0.68 , person Weight: 0.60 , individual Weight: 0.60 , activist Weight: 0.57
Siblings	third party Weight: 0.69 , general election Weight: 0.65 , congressman Weight: 0.63 , democrat Weight: 0.63 , libertarian Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at disadvantage	1.00
be at greater disadvantage	0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(candidate, be at disadvantage)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(candidate, be at greater disadvantage)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(candidate, be at greater disadvantage)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(candidate, be at greater disadvantage)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(candidate, be at greater disadvantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(candidate, be at disadvantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(candidate, be at disadvantage) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(candidate, be at disadvantage)