candidate: do fundraising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
do fundraising 1.00
ask for donations 0.80
raise money 0.77
go out on campaign trail 0.75
do fund 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(political party, raise money)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, do fundraising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(political party, raise money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(political party, raise money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(political party, raise money)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(candidate, do fundraising)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(candidate, ask for donations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(candidate, do fund)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(candidate, do fund)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(candidate, go out on campaign trail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(candidate, raise money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(candidate, ask for donations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(candidate, raise money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(candidate, do fund)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(candidate, go out on campaign trail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(candidate, raise money)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(candidate, do fund)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, raise money)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(candidate, go out on campaign trail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(candidate, ask for donations)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(candidate, go out on campaign trail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(candidate, ask for donations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(candidate, do fundraising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(political party, raise money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(candidate, do fundraising)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(political party, raise money)