candidate: run for office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
run for office 1.00
get money run for office 0.93
be chosen run for office 0.92
be nominated for office 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(candidate, run for office)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get money run for office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, get money run for office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(candidate, get money run for office)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(candidate, get money run for office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(candidate, be chosen run for office)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(candidate, be nominated for office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(candidate, be nominated for office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(candidate, run for office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(candidate, run for office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(candidate, run for office)