candidate: win voters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.60
, activist
Weight: 0.57
Siblings third party
Weight: 0.69
, general election
Weight: 0.65
, congressman
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.63
, libertarian
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
win voters 1.00
get voters support 0.93
get electoral voters 0.89
get many electoral voters 0.89
get how many electoral voters 0.87
win votes 0.86
get many electoral votes 0.81
get electoral votes 0.81
get on ballot 0.80
get how many electoral votes 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(candidate, win voters)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(candidate, get voters support)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(candidate, get voters support)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(candidate, get voters support)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(candidate, get how many electoral voters)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(candidate, get how many electoral voters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(candidate, get how many electoral voters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candidate, win votes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(candidate, get on ballot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(candidate, get on ballot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(candidate, get on ballot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(candidate, win votes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, win votes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(candidate, get how many electoral votes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(candidate, get how many electoral votes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(candidate, get how many electoral votes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(candidate, win votes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get voters support)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get how many electoral voters)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get how many electoral votes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(candidate, get on ballot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(candidate, win voters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(candidate, win voters)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(candidate, win voters)