candy cane: be sticky

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shape
Weight: 0.65
, toy
Weight: 0.63
, peppermint
Weight: 0.62
, sweet
Weight: 0.61
, candy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cotton candy
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.35
, toy car
Weight: 0.34
, gum
Weight: 0.34
, honey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be sticky 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(gum, be sticky)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cotton candy, be sticky)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be sticky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, be sticky)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(cotton candy, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cotton candy, be sticky)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(gum, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(gum, be sticky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(candy cane, be sticky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy cane, be sticky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be sticky)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cotton candy, be sticky)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(candy cane, be sticky)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gum, be sticky)