candy: hard get soft

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
hard get soft 1.00
is hard 0.87
hard get sticky 0.86
be hard made 0.83
get hard overnight 0.77
get hard chewing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gift, is hard)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(candy, hard get soft)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(gift, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(gift, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cotton candy, get hard overnight)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gum, get hard chewing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(gift, is hard)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(candy, hard get soft)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(cotton candy, get hard overnight)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cotton candy, get hard overnight)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(gum, get hard chewing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gum, get hard chewing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(candy, hard get soft)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(candy, be hard made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(candy, is hard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(candy, be hard made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(candy, be hard made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(candy, be hard made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(candy, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(candy, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(candy, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(candy, hard get soft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gift, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cotton candy, get hard overnight)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gum, get hard chewing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(candy, hard get soft)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gift, is hard)