candy: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.69
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
Siblings milk chocolate
Weight: 0.77
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.69
, gum
Weight: 0.68
, rock candy
Weight: 0.67
, toffee
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is bad for 0.79
look good 0.78
be in class good 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(refined sugar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(gum, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cotton candy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gum, be in class good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(toffee, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(refined sugar, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(toffee, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(toffee, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milk chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cotton candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cotton candy, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(gum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(gum, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gum, be in class good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(candy, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(candy, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(candy, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(candy, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(candy, is bad for)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(candy, is bad for)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(candy, is bad for)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(candy, is bad for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(toffee, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cotton candy, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gum, be in class good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(candy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(refined sugar, has quality bad)