canon: be more expensive than nikon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.33
, biography
Weight: 0.32
, dictionary
Weight: 0.32
, bible
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than nikon 1.00
be more popular than nikon 0.96
be cheaper than nikon 0.96
be better than nikon 0.95
be used more then nikon 0.92
be used nikon 0.89
be used then nikon 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(canon, be cheaper than nikon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(canon, be cheaper than nikon)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(canon, be cheaper than nikon)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(canon, be more popular than nikon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(canon, be more popular than nikon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(canon, be better than nikon)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(canon, be better than nikon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(canon, be more popular than nikon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(canon, be used nikon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(canon, be used nikon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(canon, be better than nikon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(canon, be used nikon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(canon, be used more then nikon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(canon, be used then nikon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(canon, be used more then nikon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(canon, be used then nikon)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(canon, be cheaper than nikon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(canon, be used then nikon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(canon, be used more then nikon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(canon, be used more then nikon)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(canon, be used nikon)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(canon, be better than nikon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(canon, be more popular than nikon)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(canon, be used then nikon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(canon, be more expensive than nikon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(canon, be more expensive than nikon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(canon, be more expensive than nikon)