canon: is dynamic range bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, system
Weight: 0.58
, company
Weight: 0.57
Siblings biography
Weight: 0.32
, dictionary
Weight: 0.32
, bible
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dynamic range bad 1.00
is dynamic range 0.97
is range bad 0.91
has magnitude range 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(canon, is dynamic range bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(canon, is dynamic range)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(canon, is dynamic range)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(canon, is dynamic range)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(canon, is range bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(canon, is dynamic range)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(canon, has magnitude range)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(canon, is range bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(canon, is range bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(canon, has magnitude range)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(canon, has magnitude range)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(canon, is range bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(canon, has magnitude range)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(canon, is dynamic range bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(canon, is dynamic range bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(canon, is dynamic range bad)